Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Citation
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Parent Document
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1994-05-12
Other Sections in This Document (57)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
Full Text
1,012 charsMHFA contends that this case is not about the proper measure of damages in an action for a breach of the implied warranty of habitability, but about the proper allocation of those damages. If MHFA had joined this case on the side of Wideman, this assertion might be accurate. MHFA did not do so, and it has not suggested that it is entitled to any monetary recovery in this case. In addition, there is no evidence that, in this case, or in other cases, MHFA has attempted to recover rent subsidies paid for housing units where conditions violated the implied warranty of habitability. Instead, MHFA’s position is that, in all cases, a tenant in subsidized housing is entitled to a recovery based on the amount of rent the tenant personally pays, rather than a recovery based on the value of premises as warranted. We think that this case more precisely concerns the measure of damages to which a tenant in Wideman’s position is entitled and not the allocation of damages. 8 There is language in Simon v. Solomon,