Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)

Citation
Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
Parent Document
Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
1994-05-12

Other Sections in This Document (57)

Full Text

842 chars
Cruz Management filed a notice of appeal from the judgment, but has failed to file a brief. It appears that Cruz Management no longer has an interest in the litigation because MHFA has terminated it as the project’s manager. In its motion to intervene, MHFA represented to the judge that under its agreement with Cruz Management, MHFA might be liable to the tenant for any judgment assessed against Cruz Management. MHFA also stated that a decision on the measure of damages recoverable by a tenant whose rent is subsidized with Federal funds provided pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1437f for a breach of the implied warranty of habitability, will affect MHFA’s ability to administer these funds. The judge concluded that MHFA should be permitted to intervene in this action. Wideman has not appealed from the allowance of the motion to intervene. 5