Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Citation
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Parent Document
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1994-05-12
Other Sections in This Document (57)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
- Cruz Management Co. v. Wideman, 633 N.E.2d 384 (1994)
Full Text
962 charsUnder Federal law, MHFA, as has been previously noted, has the power to abate rent subsidy payments when conditions in a section 8 unit or development are not decent, safe, and sanitary. If a landlord fails to correct conditions at a section 8 development, or is otherwise in default, MHFA has broad powers, including, the power to “terminate the [HAP] Contract or to take other corrective action, in its discretion or as directed by HUD.” 24 C.F.R. § 881.507(c) (1993). Federal regulations grant MHFA considerable power to further the purpose of the section 8 program, which is “to provide lower-income families with decent, safe and sanitary rental housing.” 24 C.F.R. § 881.101(a) (1993). See also 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(a) (1988). A tenant’s action for a breach of the implied warranty of habitability (or a counterclaim on this ground) serves the related purpose of forcing a landlord to repair defects in a substandard housing unit. See Simon v. Solomon, supra.