McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- Citation
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- Parent Document
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1999-04-08
Other Sections in This Document (25)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
- McAllister v. Boston Housing Authority, 429 Mass. 300 (1999)
Full Text
316 charsThe prior inconsistent statement used to impeach the plaintiff related to the plaintiff’s experience with the work order system, not the accumulation of snow and ice. Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the judge was within her discretion to limit the use of the deposition to issues raised on cross-examination.