Sea Castle Apartments, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1540 (1991)

Citation: Sea Castle Apartments, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1540 (1991)
Parent Document: Sea Castle Apartments, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1540 (1991)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1991-04-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5807699/sea-castle-apartments-ltd-v-san... ↗

Full Text

560 chars

Following HUD’s 1981 preemption determination, Board and others filed an action in federal district court alleging that certain HUD procedures violated due process. Summary judgment was granted in favor of HUD. In a memorandum filed October 3, 1984, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals noted that, in the 1983 preemption process, HUD had complied with all of the procedures involved in the appeal from the 1981 preemption. Accordingly, *1544Board’s action was dismissed as moot. (City of Santa Monica v. Pierce (9th Cir. 1984) Dock. No. 83-6369 [nonpub. opn.].)

Other Sections in This Document (31)

Full Text