Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Sea Castle Apartments, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1540 (1991)

Citation
Sea Castle Apartments, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1540 (1991)
Parent Document
Sea Castle Apartments, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1540 (1991)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1991-04-03

Other Sections in This Document (31)

Full Text

304 chars
Our task is to define the status quo; to determine what is left upon cessation of the conditions of preemption. Board contends the status quo is embodied in petition No. 1-0669. Sea Castle contends the status quo is the HUD-preemption rate as it existed in December 1986 when the property was refinanced.