Sea Castle Apartments, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1540 (1991)

Citation: Sea Castle Apartments, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1540 (1991)
Parent Document: Sea Castle Apartments, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1540 (1991)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1991-04-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5807699/sea-castle-apartments-ltd-v-san... ↗

Full Text

662 chars

No vehicle exists under state or federal law by which Board would be empowered to contest the rental rates set upon HUD preemption. Board’s challenge to the 1981 preemption was based purely on procedural grounds. Although the nature of that challenge is not disclosed in the record on appeal, the opinion of the Ninth Circuit establishes that different procedures were followed with respect to the 1983 HUD preemption, thereby rendering the 1981 challenge moot. Sea Castle’s assertion that the 1983 HUD preemption rates could survive the termination of federal involvement in the property thus finds no support in Board’s “acceptance” of the 1983 HUD preemption.

Other Sections in This Document (31)

Full Text