Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)

Citation: Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Parent Document: Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1953-11-04
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1171091/maxfield-v-burtt/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (78)

Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)

Full Text

540 chars

In the action in ejectment, appellant’s second amended answer alleged substantially all of the allegations of his second amended complaint in the present action; and respondent’s amended complaint in the prior ejectment action contained a supplemental separate and second cause of action containing language corresponding to that contained in appellant’s amended answer in the former action; and all parties tried the prior ejectment case on the assumption that the option agreement was an issue and evidence was admitted upon those issues.