Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)

Citation: Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Parent Document: Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1953-11-04
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1171091/maxfield-v-burtt/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (78)

Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)
Maxfield v. Burtt, 121 Cal. App. 2d 102 (1953)

Full Text

92 chars

and in deciding same adversely to appellant’s contention, this court there said at page 252: