Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hagge v. Drew, 27 Cal. 2d 368 (1945)

Citation
Hagge v. Drew, 27 Cal. 2d 368 (1945)
Parent Document
Hagge v. Drew, 27 Cal. 2d 368 (1945)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1945-12-14

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text

422 chars
Plaintiffs state that Drew made statements concerning his' title through Humber and Holmes, but there is no evidence that either of those persons were agents for defendants. The evidence, if indicating anything on the subject, points to those persons as being agents of plaintiffs. There is no showing that defendants caused any representations to be made by Humber or Holmes or were aware of any having been made by them.