Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hagge v. Drew, 27 Cal. 2d 368 (1945)

Citation
Hagge v. Drew, 27 Cal. 2d 368 (1945)
Parent Document
Hagge v. Drew, 27 Cal. 2d 368 (1945)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1945-12-14

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text

583 chars
It should first be observed that Hagge admitted that he knew at all times that there was a trust deed on the property, and the court found that during the course of the transaction he knew of the terms of it. It was on record for him to read a few days after March 7, 1942, the date of the contract. No misrepresentations were made in regard to the existence of the trust deed or its contents. Plaintiffs point to no rule of law which imposed a duty on defendants to disclose the contents of the trust deed. Hence, the trial court was justified in concluding that there was no fraud.