S. P. Growers Ass'n v. Rodriguez, 552 P.2d 721 (1976)

Citation: S. P. Growers Ass'n v. Rodriguez, 552 P.2d 721 (1976)
Parent Document: S. P. Growers Ass'n v. Rodriguez, 552 P.2d 721 (1976)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1976-08-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1251104/s-p-growers-assn-v-rodriguez/ ↗

Full Text

819 chars

(1957) 49 Cal.2d 45, 59 [315 P.2d 322].) The federal act herein neither expressly nor impliedly excludes a state court from enforcing its provisions, and there is nothing inherent in the nature of the act, such as a comprehensive federal administrative scheme, which militates against concurrent jurisdiction. As fpr the provision of the act prohibiting discrimination against a worker who invokes the act and prescribing remedies for such disprimination, there is no indication that Congress intended state courts- to refrain from imposing their own sanctions. To the contrary, section 2051 of the act provides, “This chapter and the provisions contained herein are intended to supplement State action and compliance with this chapter shall not excuse anyone from compliance with appropriate State law and regulation.”

Other Sections in This Document (79)

Full Text