S. P. Growers Ass'n v. Rodriguez, 552 P.2d 721 (1976)

Citation: S. P. Growers Ass'n v. Rodriguez, 552 P.2d 721 (1976)
Parent Document: S. P. Growers Ass'n v. Rodriguez, 552 P.2d 721 (1976)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1976-08-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1251104/s-p-growers-assn-v-rodriguez/ ↗

Full Text

662 chars

in order to decide whether the eviction was unlawfully retaliatory the trial court would have been compelled to undertake the weighty task of determining whether the company had in fact violated federal antitrust laws. In contrast, the trial court here has not been asked to construe federal law; its only duty is to determine whether plaintiff is seeking to evict defendants in retaliation for filing a suit under the federal act, a function that does not involve considering the merits of the prior suit and is thus no more burdensome than the task imposed on the courts in Abstract Investment and Schweiger. *730 Moreover, it must be remembered that Union Oil

Other Sections in This Document (79)

Full Text