Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LP, 244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 797 (2019)

Citation
Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LP, 244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 797 (2019)
Parent Document
Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LP, 244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 797 (2019)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2019-02-28

Other Sections in This Document (125)

Full Text

925 chars
As we also noted above, plaintiffs' counsel argued to the jury that charging unreasonably high rent constituted negligence, stating, "A person is negligent if he or she does something that a reasonably careful person would not do in the same situation or fails to do something that a reasonable, careful person would do in the same situation. [¶] Well, what's reasonable care? You maintain your lots. You maintain your property. When you set rents, you set a reasonable rent. Because, you know, if you don't, you're going to cause harm. That's what a reasonably prudent person does. All these things are ... acts of negligence." The jury instructions and counsel's argument plainly allowed the jury to find defendants liable under plaintiffs' negligence theory based on a finding that the high rental rates defendants charged the plaintiffs were unreasonable, notwithstanding any legal authorization for charging those rates.