DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LP, 244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 797 (2019)

Citation
Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LP, 244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 797 (2019)
Parent Document
Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LP, 244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 797 (2019)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2019-02-28
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6240337/bevis-v-terrace-view-partners-lp/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (125)

Full Text

466 chars 
Plaintiffs' counsel directed the jury to calculate damages by subtracting Caringella's market rent amount from the rent the plaintiffs had paid. He explained that he calculated the total rent paid during the relevant time period for each of the plaintiffs' spaces and then asked the jury to subtract what plaintiffs would have paid if they had paid "reasonable rent" of $ 850 during that period, explaining, "[t]hese are the damages [ ] for the gouging of the rent."