DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Fernandes v. Singh (2017)

Citation
Fernandes v. Singh (2017)
Parent Document
Fernandes v. Singh (2017)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2017-11-02
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4440239/fernandes-v-singh/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (44)

Full Text

468 chars 
6  Rawat separately contends extrinsic fraud has occurred because a sworn declaration is
sufficient to rebut the presumption of service. We agree a declaration of non-service if
credited by the trial court can rebut the presumption of proper service, as explained in a
case cited by Rawat. (See City of Los Angeles v. Morgan (1951) 105 Cal.App.2d 726,
729-731.) But the trial court herein expressly declined to credit Rawat’s declarations,
finding them “unpersuasive.”