Winslett v. 1811 27th Avenue, LLC (2018)

Citation: Winslett v. 1811 27th Avenue, LLC (2018)
Parent Document: Winslett v. 1811 27th Avenue, LLC (2018)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2018-08-15
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4526968/winslett-v-1811-27th-avenue-llc/ ↗

Full Text

801 chars

the alleged uninhabitability of her apartment vitiated her rent obligation. We do not know,
and we will not endeavor to guess. Arguments not raised by a separate heading in an
opening brief will be deemed waived. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(1)(B);
Opdyk v. California Horse Racing Bd. (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1826, 1830-1831, fn. 4 [“The
failure to head an argument as required by California Rules of Court . . . constitutes a
waiver”]; Heavenly Valley v. El Dorado County Bd. of Equalization (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th
1323, 1345, fn. 17 [“Each point in an appellate brief should appear under a separate
heading, and we need not address contentions not properly briefed”].) We will therefore
treat the eighth and fifteenth claims as having been made solely under section 1942.5,
subdivision (d).

Other Sections in This Document (44)

Full Text