Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Citation
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Parent Document
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2001-07-19
Other Sections in This Document (144)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
- Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)
Full Text
788 charsIf the landlord's breach is total, such that the tenant's nonpayment of rent is excused, I believe the tenant may enforce the attorney fee clause because the tenant has not breached the lease agreement. (See Greenwald & Asimow, Cal. Practice Guide: Cal. Real Property Transactions (The Rutter Group 2000) ¶ 11:55 ["A party's legally excused or justified failure to perform a material covenant of a contract is not a breach of contract and thus does not give the other party any affirmative cause of action." (Italics omitted.)].) That is not the case here, however. In this case, the trial court found the tenants owed $12,000 in back rent, a finding that is undisputed on appeal. Accordingly, the tenants were conclusively found to be in breach of a material term of the lease agreement.