New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)

Citation: New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
Parent Document: New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
Jurisdiction: New York (state)
Effective Date: 2005-05-05
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6306087/new-york-city-housing-authority... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (23)

New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)
New York City Housing Authority v. Pretto, 8 Misc. 3d 708 (2005)

Full Text

441 chars

This court believes that the instant proceeding falls squarely within the confines of CPLR 215 (4). Because this proceeding involves the forfeiture of a leasehold pursuant to a statute, the provisions of CPLR 215 (4) are invoked. In case after case, courts refer to summary holdover proceedings as amounting to a forfeiture of a leasehold (see e.g Sharp v Norwood, 223 AD2d 6 [1996]; Harar Realty Corp. v Michlin & Hill, 86 AD2d 182 [1982]).