Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Citation
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-07-03
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
Full Text
650 charsBased upon the foregoing, respondent’s first and fifth counterclaims set forth valid claims for relief and are appropriately interposed in this nonpayment proceeding. Accordingly, respondent’s motion is granted to the extent of allowing respondent leave to amend and file her amended answer, absent her third affirmative defense and fourth counterclaim nunc pro tunc. Additionally, petitioner’s reliance on New York City Hous. Auth. v Alexander (NYLJ, July 18, 1996, at 21, col 3 [App Term, 1st Dept]) is misplaced inasmuch as that case involved the applicability of the defense of breach of warranty of habitability to a summary holdover proceeding.