Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Citation
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-07-03
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
Full Text
983 charsThis case first appeared on the court’s calendar in August 2002. Respondent appeared unrepresented by counsel and the parties entered into a stipulation whereby the rental amount demanded by petitioner was put in dispute and the parties were to resolve this issue within 30 days; repairs were also listed on the stipulation with access dates and a completion date. Respondent restored the case upon petitioner’s alleged failure to address the repairs. The case was then adjourned several times. During this time, Judge Jimenez monitored the repairs undertaken via daily progress reports submitted by respondent to the court for the period beginning September 24, 2002 and ending October 29, 2002. The reports provide detailed descriptions of the repairs addressed, contact made — or lack thereof — with petitioner’s super and management personnel. On November 4, 2002 a stipulation was entered into adjourning the case and listing repair conditions that petitioner agreed to address.