Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Citation
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-07-03
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
- Graham Court Owners Corp. v. Powell, 196 Misc. 2d 825 (2003)
Full Text
785 charsApparently, the lead was not completely abated, respondent was not restored to possession and the parties were back in court on April 28th. An intervention report by the DOHMH dated April 11, 2003 indicated that the apartment was not properly cleaned. As a result of a conference held with the court, the parties entered into another stipulation dated May 6, 2003, whereby petitioner agreed to complete the clean up and respondent agreed to remain out of the premises and provide access. Petitioner was to notify respondent when the clean up and testing was complete. Respondent then moved for contempt against the petitioner alleging the latter failed to comply with the May 6, 2003 stipulation. The DOHMH conducted a final test on May 19, 2003 and found that the apartment was clean.