DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Aras v. B-U Realty Corp., 2023 NY Slip Op 04917 (2023)

Citation
Aras v. B-U Realty Corp., 2023 NY Slip Op 04917 (2023)
Parent Document
Aras v. B-U Realty Corp., 2023 NY Slip Op 04917 (2023)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2023-10-03
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9430365/aras-v-b-u-realty-corp/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (169)

Full Text

482 chars 
I disagree with the majority that recent case law requires a tenant seeking application of the default formula based on an alleged fraudulent scheme to prove each element of common-law fraud (Regina, 35 NY3d at 356 n 7; see also Woodson v Convent 1 LLC, 216 AD3d 585, 588 [1st Dept 2023]; Burrows v 75-25 153rd St. LLC, 215 AD3d 105, 109 [1st Dept 2023]).[FN6] The main basis for this interpretation of Regina is footnote seven (35 NY3d at 356 n 7), which stated as follows in full: