Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Aras v. B-U Realty Corp., 2023 NY Slip Op 04917 (2023)

Citation
Aras v. B-U Realty Corp., 2023 NY Slip Op 04917 (2023)
Parent Document
Aras v. B-U Realty Corp., 2023 NY Slip Op 04917 (2023)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2023-10-03

Other Sections in This Document (169)

Full Text

692 chars
The Court of Appeals has held that deregulation of rent stabilized units is not permitted during any period when the landlord is receiving J-51 benefits. It has further held that a landlord's violation of this rule prior to the Court of Appeals' 2009 ruling in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P. (13 NY3d 270 [2009]) did not constitute fraud where the landlord was acting in reliance on erroneous DHCR guidance (id.; Regina, 35 NY3d at 356). The Court of Appeals has also noted that a landlord's deregulation of rent stabilized units while it was receiving J-51 benefits does not insulate it from a holding that it was engaged in a fraudulent scheme to deregulate (Regina, 35 NY3d at 361).