McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- Citation
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- Parent Document
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2010-02-23
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
Full Text
481 charsWe note that, in the order entered October 11, 2007, the court consolidated “any prior pending action with the instant proceeding to avoid duplicative trials and promote judicial economy.” Any argument that tenant has raised against this part of the order is moot in light of the foregoing, and in light of this court’s dismissal of the March 27, 1989 petition in McFadden v Sassower (26 Misc 3d 141[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 50316[U] [appeal No. 2008-1427 W C 2010] [decided herewith]).