McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- Citation
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- Parent Document
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2010-02-23
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
- McFadden v. Sassower, 27 Misc. 3d 45 (2010)
Full Text
798 charsLandlord has also appealed from the denial of the branch of his motion seeking to dismiss tenant’s counterclaims. In light of our finding that the contract of sale was cancelled upon the cooperative corporation’s refusal to approve it, tenant had no rights to enforce under the contract of sale and occupancy agreement. To the extent that tenant’s counterclaims seek to enforce such rights, they should have been dismissed. Moreover, as noted above, tenant failed to allege sufficient facts to support a cause of action for fraud or retaliatory eviction, and the facts alleged by tenant in support of her first three counterclaims fail to state any cause of action upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, landlord’s motion to dismiss the first three counterclaims should have been granted.