Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Citation
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Parent Document
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-02-27
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
Full Text
408 charsHowever, as plaintiffs concede, the court inadvertently awarded plaintiffs quadruple, rather than treble, damages. Thus, the total judgment amount, not including costs and disbursements, should be reduced to $126,900, three times the overcharge of $42,300 (see RSC § 2526.1[a][1]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. ENTERED: February 27, 2025