Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Citation
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Parent Document
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-02-27
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
Full Text
427 charsMoreover, defendant's managing member conceded that the unsigned construction contract for the three apartments was a boilerplate instrument which listed renovations that were not necessarily completed. Although the trial court admitted the contractor's cost estimate of work for the apartment into evidence, it noted that the estimate did not necessarily prove what defendant actually paid for the renovation of the apartment.