Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Citation
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Parent Document
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-02-27
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
- Ruggerino v. Prince Holdings 2012, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01180 (2025)
Full Text
921 charsJudgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alexander Tisch, J.), entered September 22, 2022, in favor of plaintiff tenants, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 25, 2022, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a nonjury trial, found that plaintiffs were entitled to relief on their first cause of action for a rent overcharge, and declared plaintiffs are rent-stabilized tenants and the subject apartment is rent stabilized with a legal rent of $1,560.00 per month, and directed a money judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $42,300 representing the rent overcharge, and $126,900 in treble damages, unanimously modified, on the law, to reduce the total judgment amount to $126,900, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from aforesaid order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.