Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56 (1972)

Citation
Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56 (1972) 3.
Parent Document
Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56 (1972)

Other Sections in This Document (148)

Full Text

558 chars
3. The double-bond prerequisite for appealing an FED action does violate the Equal Protection Clause as it arbitrarily discriminates against tenants wishing to appeal from adverse FED decisions. It heavily burdens the statutory right of an FED defendant to appeal and is not necessary to effectuate the State's purpose of preserving the property at issue. Pp. 74—79. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. John H. Clough, Portland, Or., for appellants. Theodore B. Jensen, Portland, Or., for appellees. Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. 1