cook v johnson comm housing, No. 22-cv-3458 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)

Citation: cook v johnson comm housing, No. 22-cv-3458 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
Parent Document: cook v johnson comm housing, No. 22-cv-3458 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2025-10-03
Original Source: https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/media/19496 ↗

Full Text

642 chars

Lastly, Peter Cook cannot proceed as a Plaintiff as to the contract/warranty and
Consumer Protection Act claims. Alliance has established that Mr. Cook was not a party to the
lease and did not live at the apartment before Aria’s fall. Therefore, because he was not a tenant,
he has no remedy under a warranty of habitability theory. Moreover, because he was not a party
to the lease, he cannot claim that Alliance misrepresented anything to him. To the extent there is
not already a basis for it as discussed above, the motion for summary judgment is granted as to
Peter Cook on the contract/warranty and Consumer Protection Act claims. Order

Other Sections in This Document (29)

Full Text