Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

cook v johnson comm housing, No. 22-cv-3458 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)

Citation
cook v johnson comm housing, No. 22-cv-3458 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
Parent Document
cook v johnson comm housing, No. 22-cv-3458 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2025-10-03

Other Sections in This Document (29)

Full Text

614 chars
In Count 4, Plaintiffs claim that Defendants represented to them that the apartment was
“safe, fit, without deficiencies or hazards or known dangerous conditions and maintained in a
condition that would be reasonably safe from hazards, safe and traversable for children,” that
they relied upon that representation, that Defendants failed to deliver the apartment in the
condition represented, and that Plaintiffs suffered injury as a result of that allegedly false
representation. Am. Compl. ¶¶ 27-32. Alliance contends that the undisputed evidence shows
that it did not represent window screens as safety devices.