NORWICH HOUSING AUTHORITY vs. DAVIS, JR, DENNIS E, No. KNOCV266111969S (Conn. Super. Ct. 2026)

violation, regardless of whether the landlord believes that the violation is curable. See: BC
Management Ltd. Partnership v. Boles, 2007 WL 5077033, Superior Court, judicial district of
New Haven, Housing Session, Docket No. NHSP-90112 (November 1, 2007) The failure to
include a notice of a right to cure is grounds for a Motion to Dismiss. Housing Authority of
Torrington v. Hoye, 2000 WL 297770, Superior Court, judicial district of Litchfield, Docket No.
CV18-7286 (March 8, 2000). The so called pre-termination notice in the present case was not
served upon the defendant prior to the service of the notice to quit and did not include a notice of
aright to cure. Since the plaintiff has failed to provide the tenant with a proper pre-termination
notice, the court lacks jurisdiction to hear those counts of the complaint alleging nuisance or
violation of the lease terms. Counts two and three of the complaint are, therefore, dismissed.