Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Johnson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 911 F.2d 1302 (1990)

Citation
Johnson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 911 F.2d 1302 (1990)
Parent Document
Johnson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 911 F.2d 1302 (1990)
Effective Date
1990-08-24

Other Sections in This Document (62)

Full Text

669 chars
On October 31, 1989, acting on cross motions for summary judgment, the district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. Johnson v. Department of Housing & Urban Development, 724 F.Supp. 1257 (E.D.Mo.1989). The district court held that the Preservation Act only imposes restrictions on mortgage prepayment and not on Hillvale’s chosen method of termination. Id. at 1263-64. The district court also held that HUD did not abuse its discretion by granting Hillvale’s request pursuant to HUD’s authority under 12 U.S.C. § 1715t and that plaintiffs’ due process rights were not violated. Id. at 1264. The district court denied all outstanding motions as moot.5 Id.