Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)

Citation
Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
Parent Document
Ward v. Downtown Development Authority, 786 F.2d 1526 (1986)
Effective Date
1986-04-21

Other Sections in This Document (36)

Full Text

346 chars
Because the district court’s decision to refuse to exercise pendent jurisdiction was based on the premise that it had no jurisdiction over any federal claims, we reverse the *1533district court’s decision to dismiss appellants’ pendent state law claims so that the district court may reconsider the question of pendent jurisdiction. V. CONCLUSION