Richard Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 543 F.2d 240 (1976)

Citation: Richard Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 543 F.2d 240 (1976)
Parent Document: Richard Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 543 F.2d 240 (1976)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 1976-06-09
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/339789/richard-pickus-v-united-states-b... ↗

Full Text

708 chars

155 U.S.App.D.C. 411, 478 F.2d 615, 649 (1973): “The procedures followed in this case have resulted in a record that leaves this court uncertain, at a minimum, whether the essentials of the intention of Congress were achieved. This requires a remand whereby the record as made will be supplemented by further proceedings.” See also Mobil Oil Corp. v. FPC, 157 U.S.App.D.C. 235, 483 F.2d 1238 (1973); American Airlines v. CAB, 123 U.S. App.D.C. 310, 359 F.2d 624 (en banc), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 843, 87 S.Ct. 73, 17 L.Ed.2d 75 (1966); Kennecott Copper Corp. v. EPA, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 231, 462 F.2d 846 (1972). In Portland Cement Assoc. v. Ruckelshaus, 158 U.S.App.D.C. 308, 486 F.2d 375 (1973), cert. denied,

Other Sections in This Document (76)

Full Text