Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Richard Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 543 F.2d 240 (1976)

Citation
Richard Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 543 F.2d 240 (1976)
Parent Document
Richard Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 543 F.2d 240 (1976)
Effective Date
1976-06-09

Other Sections in This Document (76)

Full Text

462 chars
When not bounded by statutory procedural requirements, the Supreme Court has consistently been willing to assume that due process does not require any hearing or participation in “legislative” decisionmaking other than that afforded by judicial review after rule promulgation. See Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503, 64 S.Ct. 641, 88 L.Ed. 892 (1944); Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 239 U.S. 441, 36 S.Ct. 141, 60 L.Ed. 372 (1915). 13