Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Richard Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 543 F.2d 240 (1976)

Citation
Richard Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 543 F.2d 240 (1976)
Parent Document
Richard Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 543 F.2d 240 (1976)
Effective Date
1976-06-09

Other Sections in This Document (76)

Full Text

481 chars
Appellants now urge that principles of fundamental fairness and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment require an opportunity for prisoners to comment orally on the proposed rules before they are permanently adopted. We conclude that oral presentation of views is not required, and accordingly affirm the district court’s judgment. I. PRELIMINARY ISSUE The Parole Board asserts that this case is moot 2 because none of the three *242 plaintiffs are currently incarcerated. 3