Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California Municipality, 263 F.3d 1005 (2001)

Citation
Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California Municipality, 263 F.3d 1005 (2001)
Parent Document
Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California Municipality, 263 F.3d 1005 (2001)
Effective Date
2001-08-31

Other Sections in This Document (140)

Full Text

347 chars
. The City suggests that the termination of the contract cannot be an adverse action because FHF was not making a profit on the contract. The adverse action, however, is the "interfere[nce]'' with FHF’s activities, not any loss of income. Loss of profit is only relevant at the damages stage. Cf. Bd. of County Comm’rs, Wabaunsee County v. Umbehr,