Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 1964

Citation
§ 1964
Parent Document
City of Miami v. Wells Fargo & Co., 923 F.3d 1260 (2019)
Effective Date
2019-05-03

Other Sections in This Document (1383)

Full Text

492 chars
The existence of an identifiable class of persons whose self-interest
      would normally motivate them to vindicate the public interest in
      antitrust enforcement diminishes the justification for allowing a more
      remote party such as the Union to perform the office of a private
      attorney general. Denying the Union a remedy on the basis of its
      allegations in this case is not likely to leave a significant antitrust
      violation undetected or unremedied. Id. at 542.