§ 1964

Citation: § 1964
Parent Document: City of Miami v. Wells Fargo & Co., 923 F.3d 1260 (2019)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2019-05-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4616452/city-of-miami-v-wells-fargo-co/ ↗

Full Text

805 chars

10
   After this decision, the district court in the Oakland case certified two questions for
interlocutory appeal to the Ninth Circuit: “(1) Do Oakland’s claims for damages based on the
injuries asserted in the [First Amended Complaint] satisfy on a motion to dismiss proximate
cause required by the FHA?” and “(2) Is the proximate-cause requirement articulated in City of
Miami limited to claims for damages under the FHA and not to claims for injunctive or
declaratory relief?” Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Amend Order to Include
Certification for Interlocutory Appeal, City of Oakland, No. 15-cv-04321, 2018 WL 7575537 at
*2. The parties’ briefs before the Ninth Circuit are due in June and July of 2019. City of
Oakland v. Wells Fargo & Co., No. 19-15169 (9th Cir. Mar. 26, 2019), ECF No. 10.

Other Sections in This Document (1383)

Full Text