City of Miami v. Wells Fargo & Co., 923 F.3d 1260 (2019)

Citation: City of Miami v. Wells Fargo & Co., 923 F.3d 1260 (2019)
Parent Document: City of Miami v. Wells Fargo & Co., 923 F.3d 1260 (2019)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2019-05-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4616452/city-of-miami-v-wells-fargo-co/ ↗

Full Text

1,334 chars

1
  The City also alleged that the Banks unjustly enriched themselves by taking advantage of
“benefits conferred by the City” at the same time that they engaged in unlawful lending practices
which “denied the City revenues it had properly expected through property and other tax
payments and . . . cost[] the City additional monies for services it would not have had to
provide . . . absent [the Bank’s] unlawful activities.” Wells Fargo, 801 F.3d at 1261 (quoting
Complaint for Violations of the Federal Fair Housing Act at 61, City of Miami v. Wells Fargo &
Co., No. 13-24508-CIV (S.D. Fla. July 9, 2014), 2013 WL 6903725); Bank of Am., 800 F. 3d at
1267; see also Complaint for Violations of the Federal Fair Housing Act at 52–55, City of Miami
v. Bank of Am. Corp., No. 13-24506-CIV (S.D. Fla. July. 9, 2014), 2013 WL 6903721 (raising
the same claims and allegations). The district court held that these claims failed. City of Miami
v. Bank of Am., No. 13-24506-CIV, 2014 WL 3362348 at *6–7 (S.D. Fla. July 9, 2014). We
affirmed, Bank of Am., 800 F.3d at 1287; Wells Fargo, 801 F.3d at 1267, and the City did not
appeal these claims to the Supreme Court. Accordingly, they are no longer in this case.
                                               7
                Case: 14-14544       Date Filed: 05/03/2019       Page: 8 of 76

Other Sections in This Document (1383)

Full Text