Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Philomena T. Badami Stephen J. Badami Michael James Badami Thomas Joseph Badami Kimberly Ann Badami John Paul Badami Patrick Raymond Badami Daniel Vincent Badami David Christopher Badami Matthew Lawrence Badami v. Terry W. Flood Robert C. Conn Flood & Conn Enterprises Jay Ann Flood Terry W. Flood Real Estate Company, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)

Citation
Philomena T. Badami Stephen J. Badami Michael James Badami Thomas Joseph Badami Kimberly Ann Badami John Paul Badami Patrick Raymond Badami Daniel Vincent Badami David Christopher Badami Matthew Lawrence Badami v. Terry W. Flood Robert C. Conn Flood & Conn Enterprises Jay Ann Flood Terry W. Flood Real Estate Company, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
Parent Document
Philomena T. Badami Stephen J. Badami Michael James Badami Thomas Joseph Badami Kimberly Ann Badami John Paul Badami Patrick Raymond Badami Daniel Vincent Badami David Christopher Badami Matthew Lawrence Badami v. Terry W. Flood Robert C. Conn Flood & Conn Enterprises Jay Ann Flood Terry W. Flood Real Estate Company, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
Effective Date
2000-06-05

Other Sections in This Document (27)

Full Text

747 chars
21
Alternatively, Mrs. Badami could have moved, pursuant to FRAP 10(e), to modify the record. Rule 10(e) provides that, when differences arise as to whether the record on appeal truly discloses what occurred in the district court, "the difference shall be submitted to and settled by [the district court]." Again, Mrs. Badami failed to provide the district court with an opportunity to correct any errors in the record. On appeal Mrs. Badami requests that, as she tried the case pro se, we forgive her procedural error. While we are mindful of the difficulties faced by pro se litigants, we must decline. Absent a record of the proffered evidence and the trial court's reasons for excluding it, meaningful appellate review is virtually impossible.