Philomena T. Badami Stephen J. Badami Michael James Badami Thomas Joseph Badami Kimberly Ann Badami John Paul Badami Patrick Raymond Badami Daniel Vincent Badami David Christopher Badami Matthew Lawrence Badami v. Terry W. Flood Robert C. Conn Flood & Conn Enterprises Jay Ann Flood Terry W. Flood Real Estate Company, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)

Citation: Philomena T. Badami Stephen J. Badami Michael James Badami Thomas Joseph Badami Kimberly Ann Badami John Paul Badami Patrick Raymond Badami Daniel Vincent Badami David Christopher Badami Matthew Lawrence Badami v. Terry W. Flood Robert C. Conn Flood & Conn Enterprises Jay Ann Flood Terry W. Flood Real Estate Company, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
Parent Document: Philomena T. Badami Stephen J. Badami Michael James Badami Thomas Joseph Badami Kimberly Ann Badami John Paul Badami Patrick Raymond Badami Daniel Vincent Badami David Christopher Badami Matthew Lawrence Badami v. Terry W. Flood Robert C. Conn Flood & Conn Enterprises Jay Ann Flood Terry W. Flood Real Estate Company, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2000-06-05
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/768993/philomena-t-badami-stephen-j-bad... ↗

Full Text

686 chars

19
Federal Rule of Evidence 103(a) provides that "[e]rror may not be predicated upon a ruling which . . . excludes evidence unless . . . the substance of the evidence was made known to the court by offer or was apparent from the context within which questions were asked." In order to challenge a trial court's exclusion of evidence, the issue must be preserved for appeal by making an offer of proof on the record. See Dupre v. Fru-Con Engineering Inc., 112 F.3d 329, 336 (8th Cir. 1997); Holst v. Countryside Enterprise, Inc. 14 F.3d 1319, 1323 (8th Cir. 1994). Mrs. Badami failed to make an offer of proof to the district court regarding the evidence allegedly excluded by the court.

Other Sections in This Document (27)

Full Text