Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995)

Citation
Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995)
Parent Document
Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995)
Effective Date
1995-05-05

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text

353 chars
In the present case, the plaintiff does not point to any particular large-family project to which the FmHA denied funding, much less a project in which she would have lived. Thus, even if we assume that falling to acquire a government-subsidized apartment is an “injury in fact,” the plaintiff has failed to satisfy the causation and redressability *781