Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995)

Citation
Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995)
Parent Document
Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995)
Effective Date
1995-05-05

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text

433 chars
In addition to this major claim, the plaintiff also contends that the FmHA violated its own regulations by not properly reviewing the plaintiff’s notice of termination of her lease. Furthermore, the plaintiff argues that the FmHA failed to properly supervise its § 515 landlords and promulgated an illegal model lease agreement which resulted in the plaintiffs being subject to a month-to-month lease instead of a year-to-year lease.