Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995)

Citation
Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995)
Parent Document
Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995)
Effective Date
1995-05-05

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text

428 chars
832 F.Supp. 209, 215 (S.D.Ohio 1993). With regard to the plaintiff’s termination notice and lease provision claims, the court held that the plaintiff lacked standing to raise the first issue, and that the second issue was moot because the FmHA had changed its model lease agreement. We will not address the merits of the plaintiff’s claims because she lacks standing to pursue all but her last claim, and that claim is moot. II.