Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Citation
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Parent Document
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2025-12-04
Other Sections in This Document (43)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
- Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)
Full Text
445 charsretaliated against her for exercising her housing rights. Retaliation is a dif- ferent type of claim under § 3617 that requires a showing “that: (1) she engaged in protected activity; (2) she suffered an adverse action; and (3) there was a causal connection between the two.” Wetzel, 901 F.3d at 868. But the district court instead treated Farhan’s § 3617 claim as only an 8 No. 24-1532