Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hawkins v. Greenfield, 797 F. Supp. 30 (1992)

Citation
Hawkins v. Greenfield, 797 F. Supp. 30 (1992)
Parent Document
Hawkins v. Greenfield, 797 F. Supp. 30 (1992)
Effective Date
1992-08-18

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text

449 chars
Defendants contend that James Greenfield’s “sole connection to any claims in this case is his intermittent record ownership of the New Jersey Avenue property.” (Motion at 11.) Nevertheless, James Greenfield may be liable for the conduct of his father as his agent during the periods that he was the owner of the New Jersey Avenue property. See Jordan v. Medley, 711 F.2d 211, 216 (D.C.Cir.1983); International Dist. Corp. v. American Dist. Tel. Co.,