Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hawkins v. Greenfield, 797 F. Supp. 30 (1992)

Citation
Hawkins v. Greenfield, 797 F. Supp. 30 (1992)
Parent Document
Hawkins v. Greenfield, 797 F. Supp. 30 (1992)
Effective Date
1992-08-18

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text

627 chars
Defendants assert that summary judgment is appropriate with regard to plaintiffs fraud and undue influence claim. In support of that contention, however, defendants cite factual assertions that are in dispute. For example, defendants state that Adams could read and that she understood and agreed to all of the terms of the documents she signed. The verified complaint and the affidavit of Adams’s daughter directly contradict those statements. Thus, there are genuine issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment with regard to the fraud and undue influence claim. Punitive Damages Against Defendant James Greenfield